Image of Tricia Ryan

attitudes & AT | myths | no child left behind | paper/project | references | scavenger hunttranscriptsproducts & recommendationsmisunderstood minds | case studies | universal design | iep article summarystandardsindex


index

products & recommendations

attitudes and AT

case studies

myths

no child left behind

paper/ project

references

scavenger hunt

standards

transcripts

universal design

     A given scenario places me in the role of a teacher who is concerned with the appropriateness of an assistive technology device for a particular student in my class.   There is no school documentation to show record of the vendor's product or rationale for purchasing the AT device.  

What myth may have guided the purchase of this device?

  • Myth: Assistive technology is a magic cure-all for people with disabilities.
  • Rationale: Assistive Technology is one of many choices that can be used in conjunction with other methods for assisting people to meet specified goals.  Assistive technology alone may not permit people to completely overcome barriers, but may complement other resources or provide improved solutions.  
  • Myth: Determining your assistive technology needs is done only once.
  • Rationale: Determining assistive technology needs should be an ongoing and never-ending process.  Needs can change over time.  Progress and goals should be continuously re-evaluated.
  • Myth: One source has all the answers.
  • Rationale: Assistive technology options and solutions may change over time. It is important for all people involved to learn what they can about the use of technology to create accommodations or adaptations for individuals in need.  And to, furthermore, share their knowledge and experience to help others determine what works best for their context.
A second scenario identifies me as one who is team teaching with two special population pupils in my class.  At first my co-teacher was excited about  device ordered for Shelly, a special needs student.   Now the teacher is experiencing frustration because "the device does not do enough!" 

Which myth may have caused the teacher to reverse their original optimism for the AT device?

  • Myth: Product descriptions are always accurate.  
  • Rationale:  Product descriptions are written to sell the AT device.  The teacher may want to 'test' the device before making a purchase.  Other people with similar disabilities may be able to provide anecdotal information regarding the practical uses of the device. 

Myths and Rationale derived from 
Tools for Life, Options Using Assistive Technology.

 
Last updated by Tricia Ryan on December 17, 2003.
Copyright Tricia Ryan.  All rights reserved.